Are you making these mistakes with FDA 21 CFR PART 820 made for medical devices
Manufacturers are expected to follow the quality
system requirements described in FDA 21 CFR part 820This document guides to
govern the design, manufacture, packaging, labelling, storage, installation,
and servicing of medical devices intended for human use. The requirements in 21
CFR Part 820 are meant to ensure the safety and efficacy of medical devices
sold in the US marketplace.
FDA conducts regular
inspections of medical device manufacturers to ensure compliance with these
regulations. The inspection process, known as the Quality System
Inspection Technique (QSIT), evaluates a company’s internal quality processes
to determine whether they are in alignment with or in violation of these
regulatory requirements. If any violations are discovered, the inspecting agent
from FDA will issue in the form of 483 Inspectional Observations, Warning
Letters what is applicable
Here are the most common mistakes companies run
into with FDA 21 CFR Part 820:
1. CAPA
Procedures and 21 CFR Part 820.100(a) CAPA not followed adequately and repeat
failure is detected
2. Complaint
Handling and CFR Part 820.198(a) Parameters described in procedure are not
fulfilled and closure is not timely and adequate.
3.
Nonconforming Product and CFR Part 820.90(a) Investigation is not
proper, CAPA is not applied conclusion is not enough, preventive action is not
proper, repeat failure is detected.
4. Purchasing
Controls and CFR Part 820.50 control for specification and artwork s not
controlled purchase found with old label artwork and specification. PO does not
mention specification or art- work reference
5. Process
Validation and CFR Part 820.75 System is not adequate, not followed,
re-validation where defined is not done or done late, changes are not captured
in validation. Protocols are not properly and timely approved before starting
activities.
6. Quality
Audit and CFR Part 820.22 Audit done randomly, annual plan is not available,
Audit closer is not proper, audit compliance are not reviewed in Management
review meeting.
7. Device
History Records and CFR Part 820.184 Incomplete, completed in hurry just before
audit, quality and regulatory are not in full control of DHR.
8. Design
Validation and CFR Part 820.30(g) Protocol is not adequate; all aspects of
validation are not covered. Documentation is not proper.
9 PMS (post marketing surveillance) System is not
followed. Some reportable incidents are not informed to FDA. Some critical or
major complaints related to product not covered in PMS
10 UDI (Unique Device Identification) system
documentation and records are poorly maintained.
11. Production, process control and quality control and assurance: System inadequate, documentation is not timely, and records are filled late or improper. Critical values are not verified by another independent person
Comments
Post a Comment